![]() ![]() This feat is trying to eliminate the need for human interaction. just play two characters at the same time from the beginning if you somehow can't just be one, like everyone else. This is exactly why I am a d!ck about this feat.Įither you play it full, or I will haunt you with it. Leadership doesn't give you a slave, your alignment and your actions matter. What do you and your new sidekick do with your entourage of fan-boys?Īnd do you understand that your sidekick's loyalty depends upon your treatment of your entourage? You don't get one without the other, it's not fluff text, it's literally spelled out on an official table. It's literally part of the very same feat giving you your second player (Cohort). Alternatively there are builds where i took tge feat for flavour and the cohort/followers werent involved they were "just over is no happily ignoring the followers, though. I'd have happily taken a cohort feat at 1st level for those and ignored the other followers. To be honest I've several builds ive not played because they need 2 people, other players have their own character concepts they want to play and I couldnt get a 2nd character/cohort till higher level than a lot of games go. thus they follow you everywhere.īut in order for you to keep the favor and loyalty of your awesome Cohort (that you probably should have just played as a second character from the get-go) you have to keep your obnoxious entourage of fan-boys safe and fed. These followers sound like the easily manipulated sheeple that become brainwashed religious zealots, so they just want something, literally anything, to distract them from their mundane lives. I have a really hard time seeing in a dungeon crawl campaign.Īnd if you are not out building temples or whatever in your spare time as you go, then these followers are following you wherever you go. I could see it making sense in Kingmaker and the like, but I have seen it brought up in random builds. ![]() And their followers would literally follow them everywhere, like crazed paparazzi. You now have zero followers and still should probably do something about the dragon.Īs a GM, if someone at my table took this feat, I would absolutely hold them responsible for the safety and well being of their followers. your popularity is in free fall, you now face a mutiny of the remaining followers turning against you.īut before they can do anything, the dragon flies by and kills the rest with another breath weapon attack. Is the character responsible for the safety and wellbeing of their followers?Ī dragon just killed 63% of your crowd in a single fly-by breath weapon attack. Or does the character just have loose control over the crowd's attitudes and actions when around them, but they otherwise stay at home and go about their lives as normal? there is no difference between 220.Īre you having this crowd follow the character? unless it's going to actually influence the game. the 87 idiots behind me, all critically fail the check in glorious commotion. Leadership just adds complexity and nonsense to what is otherwise the really simple process of adding another character to the campaign.įollowers? A bunch of level one peasants? Who wants that associated with their characters in an adventure? Are they literally following you around like in the Life of Brian? They are, indeed, called Followers. If you simply cannot play just one character like everyone else, and you must play two characters in the same campaign, just ask the GM to let you start with two characters. Yeah, it says rolls, but it is probably the only example of actually written down rules for applying multiple multipliers to anything. times X followers per level assuming you meet any internal requirements. However by raw multipliers to followers just function as normal maths i.e. I'm princess of Tellaria with a small keep on the shores of the silver lake then I dont get get the 10 times followers benefit because I don't rule my own kingdom. That is I'm empress of Tellaria which has the imperial and Pitax palaces, Newcastle and Glenborn keep plus i have the feat i get 10 times as many followers. I don't know most of them but I do know for example the legendary commander one requires you have a stronghold and your own kingdom or you don't get its benefit. Like I said individual one smay have restrictions in the items description. ![]() ġ00 x 10 x 10 x 2 x 2 x 2 = 80,000 followers and an annoyed GM. That said and assuming they all are just multipliers wtithout other restrictions (I know ring of the Eclesiarch just doubles your followers no mention of it not stacking though its implied you need to worship a diety) the math seems fairly straightforward as they're all multipliers. Well I don't think it was ever really intended that you take all those leadership boosting items and abiliities especially since at least one of them is 3.5 edition and not really pathfinder. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |